<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What happened to the Ark of the Covenant?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nickpage.co.uk/?feed=rss2&#038;p=199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nickpage.co.uk/?p=199</link>
	<description>Author, designer, speaker, unlicensed historian, information-monger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 07:15:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Page &#187; So that&#8217;s what happened to the Ark of the Covenant&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.nickpage.co.uk/?p=199&#038;cpage=1#comment-16003</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Page &#187; So that&#8217;s what happened to the Ark of the Covenant&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickpage.co.uk/?p=199#comment-16003</guid>
		<description>[...] But there are a lot of problems with this. For a start the Biblical evidence is scanty. As I state in my book there are hardly any references to the Ark of the Covenant after the reign of Solomon. So the dates [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But there are a lot of problems with this. For a start the Biblical evidence is scanty. As I state in my book there are hardly any references to the Ark of the Covenant after the reign of Solomon. So the dates [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elaine</title>
		<link>http://www.nickpage.co.uk/?p=199&#038;cpage=1#comment-14912</link>
		<dc:creator>Elaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 20:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickpage.co.uk/?p=199#comment-14912</guid>
		<description>Ooh, this is my kind of book. Our Amazon in the States might not ever carry this one (as is the case with many fine imported titles, sadly), but I&#039;d be willing to spring for the extra shipping if the British store sells it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooh, this is my kind of book. Our Amazon in the States might not ever carry this one (as is the case with many fine imported titles, sadly), but I&#8217;d be willing to spring for the extra shipping if the British store sells it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Page &#187; Archbishop Rowan annoys the Telegraph (again)</title>
		<link>http://www.nickpage.co.uk/?p=199&#038;cpage=1#comment-13777</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Page &#187; Archbishop Rowan annoys the Telegraph (again)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickpage.co.uk/?p=199#comment-13777</guid>
		<description>[...] Actually reading the Bible, as opposed to glancing at the Christmas cards, reveals that not only was there no kings, there was no stable and, in all probability, no inn. (The word usually translated as &#8216;inn&#8217; actually means &#8216;guest room&#8217;.) I heard the interview yesterday and at no point did Rowan Williams deny the historicity of the nativity accounts - he just tried to point out what they actually say, as opposed to what people think they say. But bless him, that&#8217;s his problem. He does read and study and think about things. And it&#8217;s quite clear people don&#8217;t want that out of an Archbishop. And, of course, what&#8217;s really annoying about him is that I had a press release out about the real truth about Christmas, based on a chapter from my latest book. No chance of getting that covered now, is there? Not when the Archbishop&#8217;s doing the job so well. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Actually reading the Bible, as opposed to glancing at the Christmas cards, reveals that not only was there no kings, there was no stable and, in all probability, no inn. (The word usually translated as &#8216;inn&#8217; actually means &#8216;guest room&#8217;.) I heard the interview yesterday and at no point did Rowan Williams deny the historicity of the nativity accounts &#8211; he just tried to point out what they actually say, as opposed to what people think they say. But bless him, that&#8217;s his problem. He does read and study and think about things. And it&#8217;s quite clear people don&#8217;t want that out of an Archbishop. And, of course, what&#8217;s really annoying about him is that I had a press release out about the real truth about Christmas, based on a chapter from my latest book. No chance of getting that covered now, is there? Not when the Archbishop&#8217;s doing the job so well. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
